<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2000AD on the Beeb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forbiddenplanet.co.uk/blog/2007/2000ad-on-the-beeb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forbiddenplanet.co.uk/blog/2007/2000ad-on-the-beeb/</link>
	<description>The Best In Sci-Fi &#38; Fantasy, News, Reviews, Graphic Novels, comics and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ariel</title>
		<link>http://forbiddenplanet.co.uk/blog/2007/2000ad-on-the-beeb/comment-page-1/#comment-26103</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forbiddenplanet.co.uk/blog/?p=2951#comment-26103</guid>
		<description>2000AD is on another down-swing at the moment, I reckon. My copy of the 30th anniversary edition dropped through the door yesterday, and flicking through it I found nothing whatsoever that caught my eye and made me want to read it on the spot. 

The latest Dredd epic - Origins - has been put on seemingly permanent hiatus as well, with a couple of the usual weak-gag storylines, and now am &#039;Origins&#039; back-story which is interesting enough, but unfortunately has been drawn by Ian Gibson, who was great for comedy strips like Robohunter, but shouldn&#039;t be allowed within a mile of a semi-serious Dredd storyboard.

Seems like the only time the mag is worth reading is when they let the Edginton and Disraeli droids loose on another of their re-workings of British mythology... at least Stickleback was interesting, even if it did end rather abruptly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2000AD is on another down-swing at the moment, I reckon. My copy of the 30th anniversary edition dropped through the door yesterday, and flicking through it I found nothing whatsoever that caught my eye and made me want to read it on the spot. </p>
<p>The latest Dredd epic &#8211; Origins &#8211; has been put on seemingly permanent hiatus as well, with a couple of the usual weak-gag storylines, and now am &#8216;Origins&#8217; back-story which is interesting enough, but unfortunately has been drawn by Ian Gibson, who was great for comedy strips like Robohunter, but shouldn&#8217;t be allowed within a mile of a semi-serious Dredd storyboard.</p>
<p>Seems like the only time the mag is worth reading is when they let the Edginton and Disraeli droids loose on another of their re-workings of British mythology&#8230; at least Stickleback was interesting, even if it did end rather abruptly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Kardwell</title>
		<link>http://forbiddenplanet.co.uk/blog/2007/2000ad-on-the-beeb/comment-page-1/#comment-26005</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Kardwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forbiddenplanet.co.uk/blog/?p=2951#comment-26005</guid>
		<description>Shame so many of the comments from readers after the piece were so facile.  A lot of them seem to refer to 2000AD in the past tense - maybe they think it&#039;s no longer published?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame so many of the comments from readers after the piece were so facile.  A lot of them seem to refer to 2000AD in the past tense &#8211; maybe they think it&#8217;s no longer published?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
