Comments on: The Changing Face of Minicomics, Part 1

By: Rod

Rod — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:25:42 +0000

No worries there, Josh. Rashy may look a little more innocent, but there’s no mistaking what’s on his mind. If anything it’s even more subversive.

Ace.

By: Shannon Smith

Shannon Smith — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:35:37 +0000

Thanks Rod. Sounds good. (I’ll have even more Fluke stuff up as soon as I can make the time to sit down with the scanner.)

By: Josh Latta

Josh Latta — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:25:12 +0000

Thanks for the shout-out!

I’d hate to think that I’m softening, Especially in the 4th issue, after all- I was waiting for the 5th issue to completely sell out.

By: Rod

Rod — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:11:11 +0000

Hey Josh, I’m email you shortly.

By: Josh Blair

Josh Blair — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:02:30 +0000

Interesting article, Rod. If you e-mail your address to me at info@candyormedicine.com I’ll send you some complimentary issues of Candy or Medicine, the quarterly mini-comic anthology I publish.

By: Rod

Rod — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:39:56 +0000

Hey Shanon, I’d have added review blogs that I visit, for instance your File Under Other blog, but Part 1 was overly large so I thought about covering the importance of indy review sites (maybe with interviews?)at a later date.

Your Fluke swag looks great.

I’ll email you.

By: Shannon Smith

Shannon Smith — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:44:53 +0000

Good article Rod. I agree that POD and the internet are changing how people look at minicomics and how people are making minicomics. Rashy Rabbit (recently reviewed atwww.fileunderother.blogspot.com btw) is a good example of a more polished professionally printed book but it more than maintains the “sedition, subversion and even revolution” you were talking about in minicomics. People can argue about the semantics of what a minicomic is or should be but I thin we can agree it is a pretty exciting time to be making and reading them.