<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The DFC at six months: what the writers and artists think&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forbiddenplanet.co.uk/blog/2008/the-dfc-at-six-months-what-the-writers-and-artists-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forbiddenplanet.co.uk/blog/2008/the-dfc-at-six-months-what-the-writers-and-artists-think/</link>
	<description>The Best In Sci-Fi &#38; Fantasy, News, Reviews, Graphic Novels, comics and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:06:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1239</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lew Stringer</title>
		<link>http://forbiddenplanet.co.uk/blog/2008/the-dfc-at-six-months-what-the-writers-and-artists-think/comment-page-1/#comment-224934</link>
		<dc:creator>Lew Stringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forbiddenplanet.co.uk/blog/?p=10463#comment-224934</guid>
		<description>Much as I admire and respect the high quality of The DFC and its marvelous contributors I can&#039;t help feeling a sense of deja vu. I remember the same excitement and buzz surrounding Oink! back in 1986. We all thought it was the best comic we&#039;d ever worked on and we thought it&#039;d change the industry. We all know how that fizzled out two years later. Same applies to other comics. It&#039;s great that The DFC has such variety, and I&#039;m not faulting the content or its contributors, but I do feel there&#039;s a bit of &quot;reinventing the wheel&quot; going on when I read/hear some interviews. The main strength of The DFC is that it uses artists with modern styles. The other things it&#039;s being applauded for: serial stories, variety of content, weekly frequency, are nothing new, although it is great to see such things revived.

I truly hope The DFC can reach a wider audience because relying on the subscription method and plugs in The Guardian isn&#039;t going to keep it afloat. As I&#039;ve experienced myself with missing issues, the sub method is not flawless, so I think a more reliable distribution system is essential for the comics&#039; survival.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much as I admire and respect the high quality of The DFC and its marvelous contributors I can&#8217;t help feeling a sense of deja vu. I remember the same excitement and buzz surrounding Oink! back in 1986. We all thought it was the best comic we&#8217;d ever worked on and we thought it&#8217;d change the industry. We all know how that fizzled out two years later. Same applies to other comics. It&#8217;s great that The DFC has such variety, and I&#8217;m not faulting the content or its contributors, but I do feel there&#8217;s a bit of &#8220;reinventing the wheel&#8221; going on when I read/hear some interviews. The main strength of The DFC is that it uses artists with modern styles. The other things it&#8217;s being applauded for: serial stories, variety of content, weekly frequency, are nothing new, although it is great to see such things revived.</p>
<p>I truly hope The DFC can reach a wider audience because relying on the subscription method and plugs in The Guardian isn&#8217;t going to keep it afloat. As I&#8217;ve experienced myself with missing issues, the sub method is not flawless, so I think a more reliable distribution system is essential for the comics&#8217; survival.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

