(The first and last issues of S.W.O.R.D. by Gillen and Saunders)
This week saw the final issue of Kieron Gillen’s Marvel series S.W.O.R.D. ship to comic stores. I’ve only read issue one since every time I popped into a comic shop I couldn’t find any issues available. But issue 1 was a blast.
That it’s finished isn’t too much of a surprise; a space based minor X-Men spin-off was always going to be a hard sell. But the difficulty of generating enough sales for series like S.W.O.R.D. is something that, at least to my mind, highlights the problems of the modern superhero comic industry.
Innovation is difficult and different needs time to develop, but it appears that there’s just no time available – sales have to be there from the start and we’re stuck in a cycle of big event series, superhero comics just chasing their own tail, repeating formulas, recycling ideas and failing to innovate or develop. Sure, there are exceptions but there appears to be a complacency in modern superhero comics that worries me.
(The two collected volumes of Phonogram – and that may be all you get)
Another Kieron Gillen comic at an end was highlighted this week in a very frank and illuminating interview over at Comics Alliance in which Gillen talks about the economic factors that essentially mean that the only way we’re going to see a third series of Phonogram illustrated by Jamie McKelvie is posthumously:
“Best plan I have is just writing series 3 and then writing into my will that assuming I die young and Jamie’s still around, lob him whatever’s in my bank account to draw it. Which is assuming he’d even be willing to do it then. It’s not that we’re bitter about it — well, not just because we’re bitter about it — but that it’s been emotionally exhausting.”
“There’s a difference between making only a little money and starving. We’re very much in the latter. Jamie’s lucky to get a couple of hundred dollars from an issue. While he didn’t tell me about this until after it was all done, there were three occasions when Jamie was seriously considering throwing in the towel. The problem is that Image’s deal is a back-end one. Will we make some money off the trade? Maybe. And that’s a big maybe. But that means Jamie not earning any money for the six months it would take to draw it, which is the main reason why we took over a year to do 7 issues. As in, every time Jamie ran out of money, he had to stop and do something else. A couple of hundred dollars doesn’t cover rent or pay for his fashionable haircuts. And doing this bitty work f–ks up the production anyway, because you can’t concentrate or plan. You just spend your entire life in low-level money panic.”
That something as universally acclaimed as Phonogram couldn’t generate enough sales to keep it’s creators in food and hair products is a terrible admission and evidence, if any were really needed, that this comic industry of ours is still resolutely set up to sell stories of super people to an ever diminishing and ageing audience.
Seems to me that we’re seeing the medium increasingly polarised between the high profile literary graphic novels receiving great acclaim and sales and the insular, repetitious world of straight superheroes continuing their perennial recycling of concepts and ideas into huge event driven series that dominate the comic shop shelves.
And somewhere in-between critically acclaimed books like Phonogram, books that potentially have a huge appeal to a real mainstream audience of general book readers seem to be suffering from this polarisation and being lost in the middle.
Phonogram is available in two collections: Rue Brittania and the soon to be published Singles Club. S.W.O.R.D. will no doubt be collected sometime later in the year.













March 14th, 2010 at 12:55 pm
Sadly this is a problem likely to be exacerbated by the current economic climate where publishers and creators simply can’t take much of a risk on ‘different’ new material that may not sell much for a long time (if at all).
It isn’t restricted to the comics industry either, of course – for years there’s been a growing squeeze on what are called mid-list and new authors in prose fiction – where before a publisher who thought they had a good new talent would nurture and try to grow their readership over the course of several books now it’s often more like make a splash right away or there’s no more. As with comics it may seem to make economic sense on the balance sheet, but it is short sighted – without being able to nurture new, interesting talent where will the next generation of big name writers and artists come from? The big ‘brand names’ that publishing needs to secure large sales, be it comics or books. Big names and big sellers like Grant Morrison or JK Rowling all started off with someone in the trade seeing something interesting in their work and encouraging it, giving them that chance to build.
There’s no easy answer to this problem of course – publishers, writers and artist need investment and time but they also need to work with economic realities. Invest time and resources and money into new titles that don’t generate enough sales and it is bad for the publisher, but failure to attract interesting new writers to breathe new life into the medium and attract new readers is also bad for publishing. If only we had a magic wand…
March 15th, 2010 at 6:07 am
“If only we had a magic wand…”
or a Net book agreement.
Publishers in pursuit of greed have wrecked their own market by top loading their companies to sell at heavy discounts to large box and supermarket (and now online) retailers. These tactics have driven down the intrinsic worth of books and put the base that may have supported mid list – independent booksellers – out of business. Greed has killed the golden egg. Digital is nearly here and a new paradigm will exist maybe they can get it more right. I expect they will get it more wrong.